Well, apparently for the OP, no hangar means no airplane, so why not go down swinging?
Best would be to get the FAA to do the swinging for you, if you can, of course. Or your Congressperson.
All depends on how much you want to build and fly, I guess.
ETA: BTW, part of me feels that the reason this problem continues to come up is because far too many people just say "F*** it" and give up. I know that's been the case here with many people I've known or met, and it must be similar elsewhere. So there's a culture of "nuthin' we can do about it". Imagine if, as a group, aircraft owners and builders were known to be aggressive in asserting their rights to airport amenities like hangars in preference to non-aviation users, utilizing all available resources to fight for their rights (EAA, AOPA, FSDO, FAA HQ, Congress, lawyers, etc.). If they fought such improper use often and hard, eventually, it might become a culture that "you don't mess with the pilots...if there's a hangar without a plane, they get it, period".
But too many just roll over and shamble away..."nuthin' I can do, I guess". Sad.