Here's a question for Bob A., Bob M., and hopefully some aero guys to chime in:
If you go with a flat wing tip like this with no significant span, why even extend it all the way back to the trailing edge? Does that serve any purpose aerodynamically? Why not just end the wing tip at the rear spar, and make a matching end cap for the aileron, so they're flush with each other?
roee,
Had that discussion with Wayne (the F1 Rocket pilot that did flat tips last year, and felt he gained 3 knots). He has the same clipped wing I have, and we discussed doing just as you describe. In fact, from what I understand and from our discussion, that is how the EVO wing is constructed (flat tip that stops at the wing trailing edge, flat aileron cap, separate but all lined up). Tom or other EVO drivers will correct me if I'm off the mark on that.
Doing so may very well be a good idea from an aerodynamic perspective (I imagine its cleaner that way), but since I'd only use the flat tips during races, then go back to my standard tips, I don't want to drill holes in my ailerons and add the cap, then have the holes in my aileron when I go back to the normal tip. I guess one could make a flush insert with nutplates that could go in when the normal tip goes back on...but I looked at the ailerons on mine, and there's not a lot of "meat" to work with there. Drillin' & fillin' moveable control surfaces is a bit beyond what I want to play with as well.
Given this is fun racing (sorry for the sacriledge Bob!), the level of complexity that I'm willing to take on is somewhat limited, and I want to be able to have everything reversible.
This morning I went to the airport, installed the battery and tested the new semi-flat tips. The resulting speed was 181.5 kts. After the flight it took me 2 hours to replace the semi-flat tips with my 3" span streamlined tips and refruel.
I reflew the test and the resulting speed was 182.3 kts so I do not intend to pursue the flat tips any further.
Bob Axsom
Wow Bob, not what I expected at all...and you put a lot of work into them! I'll pursue it and see what I get. If its a bust, we'll know more. If it works as it appears to have for Wayne, perhaps more testing would then be warranted (that'd be your call of course). Wayne's wing and mine are already clipped (3.5" per side), so perhaps there's more to it than just going shorter, or there's a place where it starts to have a greater effect. That's a bit counterintuitive to me though, as you would think that shortening a longer wing would have a bigger effect, and at some point diminishing returns would kick in...somewhere before the "this wing won't fly any more" point.
Of course, there are a lot of things that go counter to intuition in this aerodynamic game, as you know and have taught us from your work! And heck, it could be that your 3" tips are just a really clean design, and going flat created more drag than lopping off 3" from them gained in span reduction. Hmmmm...do you still have those molds and templates?
I know you are very methodical in your testing...do you think one flight with each is enough to make the call? I know that's easy to say, as its your time and gas money (and I respect that). Just wondering how I'll approach it, especially if I see the same result (which will lead to many ribbings from the Stead peanut gallery!)
One last Q...did you note any bending, twisting or vibrating in those trailing edge endcaps?
Sorry that did not go better Bob...we'll keep digging in for speed!!
Cheers,
Bob