BruceMe
Well Known Member
I built my -4 fastback because I liked how it looks. If it used a little less gas, bonus. I just finished reading Dave Anders presentation <click here to download his notes> on his mega-speed RV-4 and two things stuck out at me.
#1 - He went fastback and painted together and it netted +6kts. Anders himself stated he thought it would be more.
#2 - I imagine he probably did dozens of big and small mods to both the engine and airframe, with a very high attention to detail. In the end he produced a measurable 27% reduction in drag. He summarize all his gains as:
"Flying with other RV?s w/o any of the mods uses ~ 22% less fuel per stop especially when were high and lean." and "27% of increased performance from drag reduction"
He also calculated that for the 14,800 gals of fuel he's burned, the decrease in fuel burn from his mods should have saved him $11,100 @ $3.75/gal. Forget the $5+/gal we pay now.
Looking over his changes, no one mod made any huge difference in performance. The big winners, in no particular order:
Engine:
- Electronic Ignition (for fuel burn at altitude only)
- Plenum air box
- Inlet/outlet ratio from 150% to 76%. He decreased inlet slight and outlet a lot.
- Cooling tunnel fuselage mods (smaller, see previous)
- higher compression from stock 9:1 to 13:1. He's also running ceramic heads.
- Smoother flowing cold-air induction
- 4:1 exhaust
Airframe:
- Fastback
- Paint
- Improved Gear leg fairings
- Lamb Tires
- Pressure recovery pants
- Sheer wingtips
- Aileron cuff position (re-rigged)
- Aileron hinge bracket fairings
I feel like having my airworthiness is yet another license to learn. Or stated differently, I've climbed K2 only to look out and see Everest.
-Bruce
#1 - He went fastback and painted together and it netted +6kts. Anders himself stated he thought it would be more.
#2 - I imagine he probably did dozens of big and small mods to both the engine and airframe, with a very high attention to detail. In the end he produced a measurable 27% reduction in drag. He summarize all his gains as:
"Flying with other RV?s w/o any of the mods uses ~ 22% less fuel per stop especially when were high and lean." and "27% of increased performance from drag reduction"
He also calculated that for the 14,800 gals of fuel he's burned, the decrease in fuel burn from his mods should have saved him $11,100 @ $3.75/gal. Forget the $5+/gal we pay now.
Looking over his changes, no one mod made any huge difference in performance. The big winners, in no particular order:
Engine:
- Electronic Ignition (for fuel burn at altitude only)
- Plenum air box
- Inlet/outlet ratio from 150% to 76%. He decreased inlet slight and outlet a lot.
- Cooling tunnel fuselage mods (smaller, see previous)
- higher compression from stock 9:1 to 13:1. He's also running ceramic heads.
- Smoother flowing cold-air induction
- 4:1 exhaust
Airframe:
- Fastback
- Paint
- Improved Gear leg fairings
- Lamb Tires
- Pressure recovery pants
- Sheer wingtips
- Aileron cuff position (re-rigged)
- Aileron hinge bracket fairings
I feel like having my airworthiness is yet another license to learn. Or stated differently, I've climbed K2 only to look out and see Everest.
-Bruce
Last edited: