VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 03-24-2017, 09:52 AM
rvator51's Avatar
rvator51 rvator51 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 1,011
Default Best heat box for RV-6 or RV-7?

Vans shoes three heat boxes on its website. Any suggestions on which one might work the best or is there a third party one that works better?
__________________
Regards,

Thomas Velvick
Goodyear, AZ (KGYR)

2018 Donation sent.

N53KT RV-6a Flying
N7053L RV-4 Wife's RV (RV4chick's blog)
N56KT RV-4 Finishing
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-24-2017, 10:49 AM
rzbill's Avatar
rzbill rzbill is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 2,544
Default

When I built mine, the RV-7 and 7A were designed to use the TG-10 box. I imagine one could use any of the 3 as desired.

In my opinion, the box is less important than the selection of exhaust manifold and its related heat muff. As a result of my own informal survey, I believe there are performance differences between the vertical induction manifolds and the horizontal manifolds with the horizontal manifold heat muff being less effective. It is simply a matter of available surface area. The exhaust manifold for the IO-360-M1B available circa 2010 for a 7A (mine) has limited surface area available for the muff. It is on one cylinder only (#1) vs after the collector or encompassing 2 ex pipes or surrounding a muffler on other units. All of the alternates provide more surface area and/or more exhaust mass flow vs only one cylinders pipe.

My memory of VAF posts says that there have been changes to the M1B manifold/heat muff design since I built but I am not positive on that.
__________________
Bill Pendergrass
ME/AE '82
RV-7A: Flying since April 15, 2012. 750hrs
YIO-360-M1B, mags, CS, GRT EX and WS H1s & A/P, Navworx
Unpainted, polished....kinda'
My RV Construction Page

Last edited by rzbill : 03-24-2017 at 10:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-24-2017, 06:40 PM
tgmillso tgmillso is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 634
Default Vote for all stainless

Spruce sells a stainless one (PN 08-01311) that weighs only .7 oz more than the TG-10. In my mind there didn't seem to be any point in having some fancy stainless firewall if you were going to have a gaping 2" hole right in the middle with just a thin aluminum flap covering it. A chain is only as strong as its weakest link. Best 0.7oz and $100 I've spent yet.
Tom.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-25-2017, 05:34 AM
rzbill's Avatar
rzbill rzbill is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 2,544
Default

Agreed. I simply replaced the TG-10 door with a free piece of stainless. No need to make the whole box stainless.
__________________
Bill Pendergrass
ME/AE '82
RV-7A: Flying since April 15, 2012. 750hrs
YIO-360-M1B, mags, CS, GRT EX and WS H1s & A/P, Navworx
Unpainted, polished....kinda'
My RV Construction Page
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:32 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.