Dan,
There is a lot of information out there regarding this configuration (check out the search function). But here is the issue, what works well for me does not mean it will work well for you. You did not say where you wanted to perform best (at cruise, in climb). You also did not mention your particular aircraft configuration (short gear, old wheel pants, old gear leg fairings, fastback, etc).
Everything that changes the drag polar on the aircraft also causes changes to the RPM in flight. A slick rv-4 will have the capability to spin the prop faster than an rv-4 with a lot of drag; everything else remaining constant. i.e. If Work (the Physics? definition) remains constant; you can pedal a bike much faster if you don?t have a parachute (drag) slowing you down.
In addition to that, I have had conversations with Craig Catto and he measures the pitch of the blade differently on different designs. A 67 pitch in the old style blade does not necessarily mean the same pitch on a 67 pitch new blade. He also told me that the way he measures the pitch is different than most other prop manufactures. I have mentioned this a few times on the forum. The request from Craig was to fly the set up, collect data, call him with the data and he can go into his clipboard and find out what pitch you will need in a particular blade design. Then he can change the pitch by changing the airfoil (adding carbon fiber/epoxy)
When you a buy a new prop, he gives you the prop set up that works best depending on what you want the airplane to do (climb/cruise). If your plane is cleaner than the standard, you may need a pitch change.
I hope that helps. I have done some comparison and it is documented in the archives. Others have done a great job here doing the same. Check those posts out. At the end of the day I am sure that you will love your prop. And if it needs some extra love (repitch), Craig will take care of you.