Not to get too far off of the subject, but the FAA standards are not very relevant for LED. The standards where developed for incandescent sources, buried behind a colored glass lens, not a point source like an LED. You could design an LED product that only produced light at the specific angles shown in the standard. This could leave huge gaps between those angles. Carry this out a few hundred if not a few thousand feet and the blank spots could be huge....
The graph simply connects the dots between data points. This is somewhat misleading. If the tests where done through the full range, not just the angles called out, you would see the spikes and deviations. There may very well be "holes" in the distribution as one manufacturer focuses on the specific angles to meet the FAA requirements while another might provide a product that provides more even distribution.
I would like to see how each of the products perform with a rotating mirror or spherical type Gonio-photometer, not just at the FAA's angles. This would be more meaningful.
This is not a dig on Whelen or Mike or anybody else. The FAA standard is outdated and simply not relevant anymore in my opinion.
Rework the tests across the full 120 deg. range and develop a graph that compares this between manufacturers and you then will have the full picture for LED.