A day late dollar short again
Rotary10-RV said:
George,
Just curious, did you or did you not read the earlier post in which I mentioned that the Merlins were getting pounded because the 3350's were twice their displacement? The engine in September Fury was pounding the other 3350 ci engines AND Merlins. I know a good running engine when I hear one. The mustangs days are somewhat numbered at Reno. I would like to see a radical departure like the Pond Racer again. As an aside the PR was going to run rotaries originally, but when Nissan came through with sponsorship they switched the engines to the turbo V-6's. They were a plumbers nighmare and wound too tight as well. Too bad.
Bill Jepson
Sorry I am always a day late and dollar short, you said it first. I was responding to the post directly above mine, so he did not read your post either. Darn posters, rats, Doha!
I promise, I'll be sure to read your post first next time.
Forgive my redundant post, at least I posted pretty pictures of engines.
Don't get me wrong I would love to see a modern Reno racer that is competitive, but the pond racer, not to steal your thunder, was not only tragic (RIP Rick Brickert), it was not really competitive and had lots of problems (cooling for one, like the P-51).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaled_Composites_Pond_Racer
See my previous post: "Ain't no replacement for displacement"
This brings up the auto engine thing we have fun debating all the time. The pond racer used a racing V6 turbo Nissan. Normally rated at less than 300 HP.
Honda, Lexus, Nissan and aerospace giant conglomerate Bombardier all have tried their hand in "modern" watercooled aircraft engine prototypes; all have abandoned the market (I think). Why? That's subject to conjector. Honda now makes 100% of the IRL (Indy car) engines (Toyota was not competitive), so they at least get some prestige and advertisement mileage out of it. It clearly is not money making for them. Honda spends 100's of millions to support racing. Does supporting racing make moms mini van engine better? I guess that is true. I don't fully buy it, but it may sell a few more Honda's or Acuras.
Production airplane engine's, is a loosing proposition to car manufactures. Would any big company do a Reno Racer engine? When the Pond crashed from an engine failure, I'm guessing Nissan felt the exposure was not a good thing, no doubt. All auto manufactures probably will not pursue factory airplane racing support for that reason alone. It will also not likely sell more cars. Hard to beat a +65 year old engine, the Wright R-3350, like the Lycoming, hard to beat. Old is not bad. : ) ha ha ha ha I love putting holes in the argument that Lycomings are OLD technology, which is a direct descendant of the Wright R-3350. If they are than why do they dominate in the 21st century. Talk is cheap, lets race. Car racing and airplane racing are two different things. Car race engines are awesome, IN CARS. They also get rebuilt sometimes every race, not with standing the Rally cars.
Was suppose to be rated at 1000hp a side but probably never made more than 600HP a side (1200 hp total). Even though the Bearcat is a big plane it is making the better part of 4000 hp? I am going to convert you do a BIG BORE air-cooled guy Mr. Rotary10-RV. What is the displacement of a rotary? Kidding, best of luck with your project. RV6ejguy is doing some cool stuff with his RV-10, Subaru. Its all good, just some are better.
rv6ejguy said:
Interesting stuff guys. So the TM had the much needed supercharger, that explains the big speed jump. I say the Conti and Lyco days are numbered in the Sport Class soon. (Out on a limb).
Small engine stuff with technology can whup the big radials, you just need the right guys on the project and the $$$. This has been shown in many other forms of motorsport (IMSA, F1, Trans Am, Champ Car, endurance racing etc). I watched the 2.1L AAR Toyotas slay the best 6L V8s and 3.5L F1 atmo engines race after race even after inlet restrictors were mandated for them in GTP. The big engined guys always laugh at first and end up crying the blues later. Every time.
Why are Lycs and TCM days numbered? Seems like that is all that is in the class and winning. What you got? I hear that limb your standing on cracking.
Comments like, he could not win without a turbo is moot, it is racing. What ever "helpers" you put on a subaru or rotary, work on an aircraft Lyc or TCM engine just as well. The only diff is Lycs usually don't need it for daily flying. Many car engines in planes need a turbo or supercharger to keep up, at expense of weight, complexity and sometimes cooling problems. Hey! No one is running a Lyc IO-720, 8 cylinder, yet, or a turbo-ed the IO-720, yet.
The comment about small engine stuff technology can whoop big radials. ha ha ha ha ha. Spoken like a man with a small ahaa .......... 3.0L engine. Mine is bigger than yours. A Lyc 360 is almost 6 liters and twice the displacement, direct drive, low rpm. Ain't no replacement for displacement.