VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > Safety
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-11-2018, 11:07 AM
luddite42 luddite42 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 387
Default

Any discussion is good of course, but I think this talk of mental calculations, corner velocity, L/D max, etc. overcomplicates and muddies the waters on how pilots are supposed to use Va in a practical sense when it comes to actual maneuvering. I'm still unable to glean concise and clear advice from this thread unless (consistent with my simple mindedness) the only useful application of Va during aerobatic maneuvering is to recognize that yes you are in fact either above Va and can possibly bend/break something if you have zero feel for what you're doing and pull like a gorilla...or no you are in fact at or below Va and will not pull the wings off if you handle the controls like you have zero feel and no clue what you're doing.

Again, I just don't know any aerobatic pilots who have ever even considered Va while doing acro. It's all about G load and feeling for what G load is most efficient for what we're after, but airframe protection related to the very specific Va number doesn't enter the equation. We simply don't exceed the G load limits regardless of airspeed. Maybe fighter pilots are different. Regarding LD max, this is not necessarily always the goal, depending on what you're trying to accomplish in your aerobatic maneuvering. But again, I'm not connecting this separate topic to Va. If you are letting a newbie or some kid yank your airplane around, it might be wise to limit your speed to Va in case they handle the controls like they're playing a video game, despite your best efforts at briefing them.

Regarding max recommended snap speeds, I've never thought about that in the context of asymmetric G/load and maneuvering speed. Never seen any analysis on it either. Interesting question. Snaps put high loads on the tail and longerons even if min. G is used to initiate a snap. "Rolling G" is easier to visualize and analyze in terms of G load plus aileron use, but snap dynamics are different, since they are not aileron driven and snaps very quickly break and unload. Aerobatic aircraft suitable for snapping typically list a recommended max snap speed and pilots should respect that regardless of what the higher Va (asymmetric or otherwise) number is.

Last edited by luddite42 : 06-11-2018 at 11:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:18 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.