VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-14
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: What engine did you buy for your -14?
IO-390 16 48.48%
Thunderbolt-390 6 18.18%
XP-400 5 15.15%
Tricked out IO-360 or variant 3 9.09%
Other, please elaborate 3 9.09%
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-08-2017, 06:47 PM
Av8rRob's Avatar
Av8rRob Av8rRob is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 167
Default What engine did you buy?

Curious to those who have already bought your engines for -14's what your choosing and why?

I'm really curious as to the difference between the -390 and -400? (Besides 10).
Another question is what does lycoming say about the hp difference between the standard IO-390 and the Thunderbolt?
__________________
Rob Lasater
Rv-14 Fuse
Paid nov 2016

Last edited by Av8rRob : 09-08-2017 at 06:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-08-2017, 06:55 PM
Nova RV Nova RV is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 151
Default

The Thunderbolt allows for more customization and the parts are balanced to tighter tolerances. More HP is not really expected and per my conversation with Lycoming at Sun N Fun any HP gains are probably nominal (2-3HP).
__________________
Chris Moon

Leesburg, VA
RV-14A kit # 140243
VAF 2017 and 2018 paid
www.mykitlog.com/chrismoon/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-08-2017, 10:48 PM
Driving '67 Driving '67 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oakville, ON Canada
Posts: 144
Default

I elected to go with the Thunderbolt option. I felt the uplift for the options was worth the money. The engine will have the Pmag/Slick combination with the Airflow Fuel Injection.

The engine is due in early November. Getting excited ....

Jim
__________________
RV 14A wing/tail kit done
Finishing up the fuselage .... canopy next

Serial 140118

Last edited by Driving '67 : 09-08-2017 at 11:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-09-2017, 01:27 AM
control control is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 339
Default

I was keen on alternatives as I would like to be able to skip 100LL... but in the end none of the alternatives made sense to me. ordered the 390 with one e-mag from Vans.
__________________
RV-14 kit #140138
working on the finish kit
wings, tail kit and fuselage basically done
Http://magnusrv.blogspot.se
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-09-2017, 07:37 AM
jeffw@sc47's Avatar
jeffw@sc47 jeffw@sc47 is online now
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Simpsonville, SC (SC47)
Posts: 159
Default

IO-390 Thunderbolt; one p-Mag, nothing on other side - added additional P-Mag from Emag. Airflow Performance fuel injection w/ purge valve.

Modifications needed were significant alterations to the intake air snorkle (had to be shortened approx 1/2" and different connection to the throttle body), fabricate mixture cable bracket to attach to engine near the throttle body, needed longer mixture control cable (+approx 10").
__________________
Jeff Warren
Simpsonville, SC (SC47)
1946 Bellanca Cruisair 14-13-2 (71 YRS OLD 8/15/17)
RV14A (N14ZT), Ser#140195
Start 10/11/14
IO-390 Lyc Tbolt / CS Hartzell - Currently FWF Kit
Dues paid 11/11/16 (USA 2/67-2/70)
www.mykitlog.com/jeffw@sc47
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-09-2017, 10:16 AM
Don E Don E is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 24
Default IO-390

I ordered the stock 390. Carefully considered the T-bolt option, but couldn't make the cost and value compute. Stock engines are pretty smooth; the balancing aspect would have had the most value to me. Porting and polishing sounded really good, but this is a 2,700 RPM engine and it just seemed to me that the benefit would be much less than on a high-RPM race car engine. I really tried to find a way to quantify the benefit of doing it, but couldn't. Few are going to see the enhanced paint job. And there are a lot of other places to spend the extra 3,600 bucks. So I'll take my chances that the stock engine will be smooth enough. Ships mid-October. The T-bolt rep agree that dynamic prop balancing should be done with either engine, so I will do that. Prop is already here.

My engine is coming with one p-mag and a slick magneto. I will likely fly it that way before deciding to replace Slick with a second P-mag due to the high incremental cost of switching.

Last edited by Don E : 09-09-2017 at 10:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-11-2017, 10:08 AM
Gahannaflyer Gahannaflyer is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: New Albany, Ohio
Posts: 49
Default

I went with a slightly different route. I dropped in a 400XP Superior with duel E mags and a Air Flow Performance fuel injection. I had Barrett do the engine for me and I am so far, very happy with the performance.

The fuel burn is less than 9 GPH at cruise and it runs surprisingly cool. Even the hottest days this summer I was just a bit over 300 deg F.

I had to modify the cowling slightly to accommodate the fuel controller. Although when I talked to the chaps at AFP, they said that if you just tell them ahead of time when they set up the unit for install, they will shorten the bottom elbow and the modification necessary will be minimal. The snorkel had to be modified too, so that it would slide over the outer part of the fuel controller and make a nice fit.

Steve
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:47 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.