VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 09-26-2018, 09:09 AM
Bavafa Bavafa is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,438
Default EarthX battery

I was wondering how many have chosen EarthX battery for their 14 and which model was chosen, the 680 or 900.

I am planning on getting the EarthX but unsure of which model. Do I really need a 900 for the IO390 or simply an overkill?
__________________
Mehrdad
RV7A - IO360M1B - SOLD
Dues paid
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-26-2018, 09:41 AM
Carl Froehlich's Avatar
Carl Froehlich Carl Froehlich is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dogwood Airpark (VA42)
Posts: 1,667
Default

While cranking amps is a consideration, battery reserve (amp-hours) tends to drive selecting battery size.

Decide how many hours of flight you want to have on battery power alone. If this will be an IFR plane, strongly recommend a two battery design scheme. Identical batteries are, in my opinion, advantageous over mixed.

Carl
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-26-2018, 01:10 PM
JohnInReno's Avatar
JohnInReno JohnInReno is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Prescott Valley/Chandler AZ
Posts: 293
Default Alternator size

My understanding from talking to EarthX is that the alternator output determines the size. The 680 is limited to 60 amps and the 900 is sized for 70 amps.

Call EarthX to confirm.
__________________
John Morgensen
RV-9A N946PM 500+ hours since 2013
Nevada/Arizona
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-26-2018, 01:33 PM
AX-O's Avatar
AX-O AX-O is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,237
Default

I have a 60A alternator and I run an EarthX 1200. I wanted to remove my secondary battery so this was the best way to go for my system. Kathy is AWESOME. Give her a call.

This battery has operated well thus far. it is hanging on my firewall on the FWF side.
__________________
Axel
RV-4 fastback thread and Pics
West Coast Ravens
VAF 2018 paid VAF 704
The information that I post is just that; information and my own personal experiences. You need to weight out the pros and cons and make up your own mind/decisions. The pictures posted may not show the final stage or configuration. Build at your own risk.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-26-2018, 01:54 PM
schristo@mac.com's Avatar
schristo@mac.com schristo@mac.com is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: WA
Posts: 953
Default I would go with the 900 but he 680 is adequate...

I have been running the 680 for several years and more than 600 hours and it is adequate for a 390 but if I had it to do over again I would go with the 900 for the extra reserve and depth of charge.
__________________
Stephen

RV7 powered by a lycoming thunderbolt IO-390
turning a whirlwind HRT prop

flying with more than 1,930 on the hobbs
Race 771
margarita!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:07 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.