What's new
Van's Air Force

Don't miss anything! Register now for full access to the definitive RV support community.

The Benefits of IFR and side stories

Ed_Wischmeyer

Well Known Member
On Friday, the mission was to fly the RV-9A from Savannah down to Jesse Saint's shop near Ocala, Florida, to get cracks in the boarding steps welded. The morning weather in coastal Georgia was low clouds and ugliness, but no rain. I thought. Fortunately it was localized.

Departure was easy, with the autopilot engaged 500 feet up. Instead of TOGA, I used autopilot vertical speed mode and heading hold to comply with the departure instructions. One minute in the clouds and we were on top. The rest of the flight was clear of clouds in smooth, cool air till the descent when I was in and out of the puffy clouds in warm, bumpy air. So an hour and a half flight was easy with only a few minutes of IFR but if I'd tried VFR, I would have been on the ground waiting for the weather so I could bump along in warm air. And IFR, I was careful to not fly over regions of low ceilings where I would have no chance of finding a landing spot if I had to descend through the goo after a power failure.

Coming back this morning, departure was all in VMC, but the radar (cellphone app on the ground, ADS-B uplink in the air) showed a line of showers coming in off the Atlantic. With the moving map and heading hold on the autopilot, I deviated inland to avoid that weather, using the ADS-B to help me figure out which clouds were worth the closest visual inspection. The big cloud ahead didn't show up on the ADS-B but as I got closer, there were little puffs coming out the top, indicating that vertical development (bumps, in other words) were starting. I deviated farther inland, went through 30 seconds of cloud with only the lightest turbulence, and then was in another air mass with all kinds of beautiful clouds in the distance. The deviations cost me maybe 10 minutes of flight time, but smooth air instead of hefty bumps in the clouds was well worth it.

Close to home, I skimmed the tops of clouds at 2000 feet before intercepting the glideslope, breaking out at maybe 1200 feet. This was my first ILS in actual IMC in the RV-9A, and the autopilot did just fine. I disconnected at 500 feet so I could make the first turnoff.

So once again, ugly VFR was super simple IFR, both ways. And I used the technology to avoid the bumps as well. Wish I could do that in the RV-8, but that would require an approved navigation radio, a backup attitude indicator, autopilot, and a new panel. Worth doing on a new plane, but not on a retrofit.

On another note, the steps received white powder coating that matched the white paint on the airplane, replacing the dark blue paint that they had originally. The nice result was that the steps now contrast nicely with the lower fuselage without having to be in some obnoxious orange.

And on a last note, the folks at ITEC aviation were all just great. They are all mission (as in missionary) oriented, and I've met so many missionaries that were just great folks. At the back of the hangar was a mural, 40 feet wide, painted by Lawrence Saint who got his start restoring stained glass windows in Europe after WWI. His son Nate Saint was martyred in the Amazon in 1956, and Nate's oldest son Steve wound up living a few years in the jungle with the tribe that killed his dad. Jesse is Steve's oldest son. Many stories there worth the telling and looking up on the web.
 
IFR

Thanks for the story. I am working on my instrument rating right now after being an VFR pilot for 25 years. I am 55 but still think I'm young enough to learn. I am also upgrading my RV 7a with a new Gamin GTN 625. I'm sure it will all be worth it.
 
Honestly, I hate long XC's in a VFR only plane. If I have the ability to fly IFR, then I will often fly VFR, but happy I have the ability if needed. In my Pitts, I have no IFR ability so a long XC is more stressful.
 
FWIW: I have gotten so used to IFR flying that I am almost afraid to fly long distance VFR only. For flying around the local airports, VFR is the fun way to do it. But for long cross countries, IFR is the only way I go. YMMV

:cool:
 
Thanks Ed

I've been in and out of getting the IFR rating. Lots of money spent on John/Martha videos, weekend prep classes, so forth over the years. Mid -50's isn't nice to a feller trying to learn/relearn/learn stuff but it's good to know that some are able to do it.

Waiting on vfr weather when I have available to me a nice twin is quite criminal. I can't imagine how good it is to be able to plan a trip without worrying about vfr at destination.
 
Ifr great tool

I read your story and one thing popped out at me..auto pilot on..

Auto pilot is a nice thing to have but dont bet your life on it. Could you fly that whole trip without your Autopilot.

First real imc ILS was that a chance to reinforce a perishable skill?

Somethings to think about

Cm
 
I read your story and one thing popped out at me..auto pilot on..

Auto pilot is a nice thing to have but dont bet your life on it. Could you fly that whole trip without your Autopilot.

First real imc ILS was that a chance to reinforce a perishable skill?

Somethings to think about

Cm

+1 here

While I happily put the AP on for long cruise segments, I always hand fly any IMC that I get in all other phases, including the entire approach. I simply don't get enough time in actual to stay as sharp as I would like and couldn't imagine passing up the opportunity. While I have done some AP testing in VMC, I have never shot an approach on AP, except for the one required on my checkride. I imagine I may not feel this way if I was exposed to actual conditions on a regular basis.

For me anyways, after not flying IMC for several months, the first minute or two is big adjustment and it takes a bit for things to become second nature again. In the busy Chicago airspace, I have dropped into a layer, from VMC, just as I am being vectored all over creation, with rapid altitude changes, then right into the approach. It all happens fast and you need the skills to be relatively sharp. I would not want to be in that situation with an inop AP if my SOP was an AP driven approach.
Larry
 
Last edited:
While I happily put the AP on for long cruise segments, I always hand fly any IMC that I get in all other phases, including the entire approach.

Agree 1,000%. FWIW I hand fly every approach all the way to the missed approach point when needed. But the autopilot is AWESOME for the cruise portion of a trip. It keeps me right where I am supposed to be but the best part is I am significantly more alert and rested after several hours of flying in the clouds. So when I start the approach phase I can do a much better job. THAT to me is a great overall safety enhancement. YMMV

:cool:
 
There's more to it.

I'm flying mostly autopilot so that I can learn how to use it, what it's really doing, so that I can get the autopilot parameters tuned in, and so that I can fuss with the weather uplink and all the other toys on the panel.

For the last 40 some years, I've flown IFR in planes without autopilots, and with paper charts. Hand-flying is not an issue for me. But still, the next step will be to hand fly really well while fussing with all of the panel toys.

Great comments, y'all!

Ed
 
I can't say enough about how an instrument ticket made me a more precise flyer even in VFR.

I've had the ticket for ten years and used it plenty. Most of the time it was to take off in the common early morning fog at Asheville KAVL and go to a VFR destination. Simple. About a 1/4 of the time an approach was needed on the other end.

However, recently I had to do in real life for the first time something we train for. A real missed approach and use of the alternate to sit on the ground and wait. Waited for the weather to get above minimums at the desired destination and shot successful approach, popping out at 500 AGL.

It has been a learning experience. I have flown through the remains of 3 hurricanes (Harvey and others) and during those experiences I have learned how good the ATC folks really are. Its gratifying to be a part of that team to create a safe flight.
 
There's more to it.

I'm flying mostly autopilot so that I can learn how to use it, what it's really doing, so that I can get the autopilot parameters tuned in, and so that I can fuss with the weather uplink and all the other toys on the panel.

For the last 40 some years, I've flown IFR in planes without autopilots, and with paper charts. Hand-flying is not an issue for me. But still, the next step will be to hand fly really well while fussing with all of the panel toys.

Great comments, y'all!

Ed

I am envious of your experience. I am a relatively new IFR pilot, so must be diligent in keeping up with practice. These RVs don't like to do the same thing for very long, especially in bumpy air. I maintain a good level of fear for what would happen if I am not "on my game."

Larry
 
These RVs don't like to do the same thing for very long, especially in bumpy air. I maintain a good level of fear for what would happen if I am not "on my game."

Larry

Agreed! That's part of why I avoided big cumulus clouds as I did on the way home. Stratus, not so much.
 
I agree with the idea that you should not rely on the AP however my instructor put it this way. Single pilot IFR is one of the most difficult, task intensive things you can do in aviation and anything (including the AP) that can reduce the workload should be used. Along with hand flying he made sure I was fully familiar with the AP including using it for the approach.

Obviously I try to keep my hand flying skills sharp but personally I would not start/continue an IFR Flight in IMC if the AP was not working.
YMMV

Fin
9A
 
Last edited:
IFR MEL (Minimum Equipment List)

Autopilot req'd.

I won't fly single pilot IFR in an RV without it. Too many ways in a quick-handling type of aircraft like the RV is to get into an unusual attitude without it.

No autopilot? No problem, either wait till VFR or find another way home.

My two cents.
 
Last edited:
Autopilot req'd.

I won't fly single pilot IFR in an RV without it. Too many ways in a quick-handling type of aircraft like the RV is to get into an unusual attitude without it.
.

A bit general. The -10 and -14 are noticeably more stable than the -7.
 
Back
Top