VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-7/7A
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-22-2014, 01:53 PM
alwaysoutdoor alwaysoutdoor is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Twisp, WA
Posts: 43
Default Will I have a CG issue? catto prop on a light RV-7

I have a question to other RV-7 builders and what their CG ended up being.

On my project (taildragger) I will be putting on an IO360 M1B and kinda want either the 2 blade or 3 blade catto prop. I will be painting the plane just 1 solid color and only installing the MGL extreme mini EFIS/EM and probably a Nexus tablet for GPS on the instrument panel (I'm keeping it super simple and CHEAP!). Do you think I will have a CG issue once I am finished with everything (being tail heavy)? What would you recommend me changing? Should I put on a metal FP Sensenich instead of the catto? Use catto and add a super heavy crush plate? Would putting the lightweight tailwheel on solve much for the extra $105 (only is 1lb lighter)?

I would like some advice on what I should do so I don't have big problems once I bring out the scales- I see myself wanting to use the baggage compartment on long flights. Thanks for the help

p.s. I already have the finish kit so changing to the 320 mount to get weight forward is not an option.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-22-2014, 02:40 PM
RV10inOz's Avatar
RV10inOz RV10inOz is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brisbane Qld. Aust.
Posts: 2,116
Default

Most likely you will need to add a weighted crush plate for the prop.

I think Catto sells them???

Many have been here before, I made one for Jamie Lee's RV7, and calculated the mass required.

In my opinion a Hartzel C/S is the go, but it is not cheap.
__________________
______________________________

David Brown


The two best investments you can make, by any financial test, an EMS and APS!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-22-2014, 04:09 PM
BillL BillL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central IL
Posts: 4,358
Default

There is a W&B thread for 7's here that can provide you with data. The Cato props seem to have a CG an inch further aft. Plotting the data and comparing your weights should help your understanding. Sorry, I don't have access to the plotted data today.
__________________
Bill

RV-7
1st Flight 1-27-18
Aerobatics done
Phase II 8-3-18
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-22-2014, 04:20 PM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 11,377
Default

Keep building it as light as you can and don't worry. Once you weigh it, you can add ballast, if you need to.

Remember, it is much easier to add weight to a light plane then remove it from a heavy one.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-22-2014, 04:57 PM
rzbill's Avatar
rzbill rzbill is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 2,525
Default

Would it be worthwhile to talk to Vans about the 320 mount dimensions?
I understand it moves the engine further forward. It might be a way to KEEP it light rather than adding the weighted crush plate
__________________
Bill Pendergrass
RV-7A: Flying since April 15, 2012. 710hrs
YIO-360-M1B, mags, CS, GRT EX and WS H1s & A/P, Navworx
Unpainted, polished....kinda'
My RV Construction Page
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-22-2014, 05:42 PM
tadsargent's Avatar
tadsargent tadsargent is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 303
Default

The 7 was not designed for a wooden or composite propeller. Your CG will be aft
And the max baggage will be limited. Additionally with 2 average persons aboard you may not be able to land with minimum fuel on board.
My 7a needed more than a 12 pound landoll ring to help the weight. That's why I put on the metal prop which helped. The solution was the Hartzell constant speed propeller.
__________________
Tad Stripes Sargent
TeamAeroDynamix.com
Flight Lead
ICAS Pilot
GRT HXr Glass
TITAN POWERED IO-370
Hartzell's advanced composite propeller
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-22-2014, 05:51 PM
Brantel's Avatar
Brantel Brantel is online now
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newport, TN
Posts: 6,903
Default

I second Stripes comment.

To get mine in a more useful position was going to require way to much dead weight on the nose.
__________________
Brantel (Brian Chesteen),
Check out my RV-10 builder's BLOG
RV-10, #41942, N?????, Working on Emp/Tail Cone
---------------------------------------------------------------------
RV-7/TU, #72823, N159SB
Lyc. O-360 carbed, HARTZELL BA CS Prop, Dual P-MAGs, Dual Garmin G3X Touch
Track N159SB (KK4LIF)
Like EAA Chapter 1494 on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-22-2014, 06:50 PM
rockwoodrv9 rockwoodrv9 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Meridian ID, Aspen CO
Posts: 2,429
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brantel View Post
I second Stripes comment.

To get mine in a more useful position was going to require way to much dead weight on the nose.
The weight in the front the same if it is a plate or a CS prop. I understand the CS prop gives performance for the weight, but the nose wheel doesn't know that.

I looking at the same issue with my 9A. I have a O-320D2A and will be putting a Catto prop on it because I like how smooth they are. I may have to put a weight in front to get the baggage capacity I want, but Im ok with that. If I ever want to change to a CS prop, it will be an easy change.
__________________
rockwoodrv9a
Meridian Idaho
rockwoodrv9a@gmail.com
O-320 D2A
Awaiting DAR Inspection
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-22-2014, 09:46 PM
crabandy crabandy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ottawa, Ks
Posts: 1,885
Default

My RV7/O-360/3 blade Catto weighed in at 1038 with leather/carpet but only a G3X and a handheld. With my typical combined passenger weight of 350 lbs, I was CG limited to about 60 lbs baggage with min fuel. I added the 12ish lb landoll ring to the flywheel and inow I can use the full 100 lbs baggage.
I'm happy with my choice.
__________________
RV 7 300 hours and counting
12/17 donation
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-22-2014, 09:49 PM
McFly's Avatar
McFly McFly is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 333
Default will you have an issue? maybe but probably not

I was in the same boat as you, a light and simple RV-7 (1050 pounds).

I used a 10 pound crush plate from Sabre. With the 17 pound Catto, it is 30 plus pounds lighter than a CS setup. I also used a light weight tailwheel, which pushed the CG forward 1/4".

Having said all that, there are some situations that I have to avoid. Flying acro with a passenger over 180 lbs is one (not a problem for me) and empty tanks with a passenger and full baggage. I have found that easy to plan around.

You may have to do some soul searching to see if you can live with those limitations. It has been a non issue for me. Good luck.
__________________
Hugh
Northern California
RV-7 Flying
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:41 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.