VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #11  
Old 04-26-2017, 09:48 PM
Canadian_JOY Canadian_JOY is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,940
Default

As Carl so accurately observed, my choice of words was quite intentional. Alkaline D-cells just don't do well when asked to put out the large current spike required for the high transmission power of the 406MHz data burst. As a result there are no 406MHz ELTs which are certified for use with over-the-counter alkaline D-cells.

While it may not be immediately obvious, ELT manufacturers aren't getting super-rich selling ELT's. They rely on the sales of battery packs to provide some on-going income, without which the sale of 406MHz ELT's in the sub-$1000 range would be totally unsustainable.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-27-2017, 05:37 AM
todehnal todehnal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kentucky Lakes area in KY
Posts: 931
Default

So, is the Ultralife U10014 the one we need?

I see that there are quite a few "D" cells offered
U10013, U10014, U10015, U10016, etc. Confusing!

Tom
__________________
2013- RV12, Kit #119. N123M First flight Nov21. It's a keeper!
1998- RV-9 tail kit, built and sold
1989- RV-6 tail kit, built and sold
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-27-2017, 06:09 AM
Mich48041 Mich48041 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Riley TWP MI
Posts: 2,805
Default

Part numbers: U10015 and U10016 have solder tabs.
__________________
Joe Gores
RV-12 Flying
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-27-2017, 08:23 PM
RFSchaller RFSchaller is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,435
Default

The term "airworthy" is interesting. We do not certify our experimental aircraft to be airworthy at annual because there is no type certificate we comply with. We certify they are in a condition for safe operation. We can fly with avionics in IMC even if they aren't TSO'd. Why would you conclude the ELT must be TSO'd?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-30-2017, 05:30 PM
Canadian_JOY Canadian_JOY is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RFSchaller View Post
The term "airworthy" is interesting. We do not certify our experimental aircraft to be airworthy at annual because there is no type certificate we comply with. We certify they are in a condition for safe operation. We can fly with avionics in IMC even if they aren't TSO'd. Why would you conclude the ELT must be TSO'd?
Ummm... not to be too argumentative, but we ARE required to use some TSO'd avionics when we fly IFR, or to have verifiable performance in compliance with the TSO. As an example (and, regrettably, a darned expensive one) nobody is flying with a non-TSO'd GPS navigator to do LPV approaches because very, very few people have the capacity to design a device to the same standard as required by the TSO AND demonstrate that it meets the technical and performance standards set out in the TSO.

With respect to ELT's, I won't do all the leg work for you but rather will suggest you peruse some earlier discussions on this topic wherein you will find references to the exact FAR which mandates the carriage of a TSO approved ELT. It does not mandate a 406MHz ELT, but it does mandate a device approved under TSO C91a (for new installations on US-registered aircraft) or any of the versions of TSO C126.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-30-2017, 10:21 PM
RFSchaller RFSchaller is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,435
Default

A Canuck citing FARs?!😝
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-01-2017, 07:17 AM
Canadian_JOY Canadian_JOY is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RFSchaller View Post
A Canuck citing FARs?!😝
Almost as funny as an American who remains unaware of FARs, despite the best efforts of others to lead him into the light...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-01-2017, 07:43 AM
Piper J3's Avatar
Piper J3 Piper J3 is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Hinckley, Ohio
Posts: 1,322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian_JOY View Post
Almost as funny as an American who remains unaware of FARs, despite the best efforts of others to lead him into the light...
Excellent... need neighbors to our north to help straighten out American politics as well.

And that isn't even funny.
__________________
-
Jim Stricker
Hinckley, Ohio (1OA2)
EAA #499867
PPL/ASEL 1970 - Sport Pilot since 2007
80 hrs Flying Aeronca Chief 11AC N86203
1130 hrs Flying 46 Piper J-3 Cub N6841H
RV-12 E-LSA #120058 AWC July 2012 N633CM
RV-12 Bought Flying Oct 2015 with 48TT - Hobbs now 421

LSRM-A Certificate 2016
Special Thanks... EJ Trucks - Crew Chief A-4 Skyhawks
and MJ Stricker (my flight instructor) - 1st Lt./Captain B-17H WWII
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-01-2017, 10:50 AM
RFSchaller RFSchaller is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,435
Default

OK, this is war! We're sending Justin Bieber back!😜
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-01-2017, 12:45 PM
rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hubbard Oregon
Posts: 8,116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RFSchaller View Post
Mark,

Some ELTs use Duracell D cells. That would seem to contradict your conclusion.

Rich
The designer and Manufacturer of that ELT specifically specified Duracell D sized batteries (with expiration date) so using them as replacements (actually when delivered, the new the ELT's came without any batteries) met the TSO.

91.207 Emergency locator transmitters.

(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section, no person may operate a U.S.-registered civil airplane unless -

(1) There is attached to the airplane an approved automatic type emergency locator transmitter that is in operable condition for the following operations, except that after June 21, 1995, an emergency locator transmitter that meets the requirements of TSO-C91 may not be used for new installations:

91.207 also dictates what inspections and record keeping of those inspections is required for all U.S. civil aircraft.
__________________
Any opinions expressed in this message are my own and not necessarily those of my employer.

Scott McDaniels
Hubbard, Oregon
RV-6A (aka "Junkyard Special ")

Last edited by rvbuilder2002 : 05-01-2017 at 12:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:36 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.