VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 04-16-2018, 02:50 PM
Adam W Adam W is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Thornhill, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 94
Default prop choice

Hey all

canopy done engine hung yesterday, and on to the cowl. This had me thinking Do i need a propeller to properly fab up the cowl?
and if so, I'm not prepared research wise for that decision
I am constant speed, IO-360 Fuel injected with a cold air superior sump with horizontal intake. from a weight perspective its a slider with a G3X dual screen system and GTN650 planned. no steam gauges.
I guess the look and smoothness of three blade is the wish. question is composite or aluminium? and size?
I'm no expert on the W & B math so any advice here on what is best would be great. I expect the composite CS will be very expensive. I also heard the composite may cause an aft C of G reducing baggage capacity
id appreciate any advice on what prop to go with. my mission will include some shorter grass strips, but not under 1600 feet
im building a 7
__________________
Adam Wachtel
Thornhill Ontario Canada
Building RV7 #70770
Wings done
Empenage done
QB Fuse done
Finish kit underway
Vans Airforce Dues Paid
Flying Piper Supercub PA18 150
Flying Cessna 414A
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-16-2018, 04:38 PM
Jpm757 Jpm757 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Sherman, CT
Posts: 171
Default

Adam,
Finished my -7 in Nov., now with 100hrs and counting. I have an IO-360 M1B with an MT 3 blade that I purchased thru Van's. I could not be happier with this combination. The delivery time was about 14 weeks on the prop and I was ready to fit my cowlings long before expected delivery. I rented the Flyboys cowlings installation tool and used the MT dimensions to fit the cowling. When the prop arrived (spinner mounted and painted), I just bolted it on and VIOLA! Perfect fit. Very smooth prop as well as good ground clearance for unimproved strips. My EW came in at 1081# CG 80.4 with dual AFS 5600 displays and autopilot. Pricier than the Hartzel, but if you figure in the spinner assy.and labor, its comparable.
__________________
Jake
RV6 completed 1991 sold.
RV7 #72018 N767T first flight 11/21/2017 100+hrs.
2018 dues paid.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-16-2018, 08:03 PM
9GT's Avatar
9GT 9GT is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Southern Michigan
Posts: 1,419
Default

The 3 blade MT I ordered last month for my -9A is through Tiffin Aire http://www.tiffinaire.com/en/Home.aspx . I saved considerable $$$$ going through them as apposed to Van's. They are a dealer and authorized service center for MT.
__________________
David C.
Howell, MI

RV-9A: Under Construction. N161RV (Reserved)
RV-10: N959RV Completed 12/29/2013 SOLD 08/23/2016

"Donor Exempt" but donated through Dec. 2018
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-17-2018, 09:56 AM
mike newall's Avatar
mike newall mike newall is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 1,597
Default

MT 3 blade - awesome takeoff and landing performance, couple of knots slower cruise, but super smooth and great 'ramp presence' (I do hate that saying )
__________________
"I add a little excitement, a little spice to your lives, and all you do is complain!" - Q

Donated twice in 2017
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-12-2018, 01:30 PM
Chattin35 Chattin35 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 214
Default Get a Hartzell BA prop

The -7 was designed around the parallel valve Lycoming 360 and Hartzell CS prop. I have that combo on my -7 and the W&B came out beautifully. It's almost impossible to load it out of limits. Not to mention, it feels perfectly balanced in flight.

Also, I highly recommend a CS prop. Putting anything else on an RV is like buying a sports car and only driving it in 2nd gear. It hurts the pocket book initially. But, it'll make up for it in fuel savings over time (I actually did the math back in the day). And, the performance gains in all phases of flight are substantial.

My 2 cents.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-12-2018, 11:55 PM
gasman gasman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sonoma County
Posts: 3,412
Default

Maintain it IAW Hartzell, and it will be the most expensive single item on the aircraft to maintain.
__________________
VAF #897
2017 =VAF= Dues PAID
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-13-2018, 06:15 AM
robertahegy's Avatar
robertahegy robertahegy is offline
Moderator/Tech Counselor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Troy, WI
Posts: 1,912
Default

My 7A with 0-360 A1A and Hartzell BA prop was a great combination. Well balanced and smooth as glass out of the box.

Roberta
__________________
Roberta Hegy
Built/Flew an RV-7A
Air Troy Estates, East Troy, WI
GS 350 Lexus and TRICE "Q"
Built Glen L "ZIP" Classic Outboard Runabout and Super Spartan Hydroplane
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-13-2018, 07:23 AM
schaplerrh schaplerrh is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Alexandria VA
Posts: 246
Default prop choice

I'm happy with the 2-bladed acro MT on my -7.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-13-2018, 09:43 AM
Carl Froehlich's Avatar
Carl Froehlich Carl Froehlich is online now
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dogwood Airpark (VA42)
Posts: 1,427
Default

The biggest mistake I made on my first RV was putting a FP prop on it. At 300 hours I replaced it with a Hartzell BA prop. To say the change was dramatic fails to capture the impact. I was now flying the plane that I always wanted. As previously posted, the speed range on an RV is so broad no FP prop will come close to meeting the changing conditions.

For those builders that ask me, I say:
- If you want a simple plane for flying around the patch and occasional cross country, or canít justify the additional cost, pick one of the many FP props out there and fly on. It will still fly like an RV.
- If you want to spend a boatload of money and go fancy, pick one of the composite CS props.
- If you want the very best bang for the buck and are obsessed with high efficiency cruise and top speed, get the Hartzell BA prop.

The brand new Hartzell prop for the current RV-8 build is in the hangar - engine and prop hang in a couple of weeks.

Sorry if I stepped on any toes.

And the debate goes on....
Carl
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-13-2018, 09:52 AM
Rick_A's Avatar
Rick_A Rick_A is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Highland Village, TX
Posts: 1,387
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gasman View Post
Maintain it IAW Hartzell, and it will be the most expensive single item on the aircraft to maintain.
Please explain. My Hartzell has been trouble free for 9 years & 900 hours. So my only maintenance cost is a little bit of grease once a year.

I know that Hartzell states the recommended overhaul is at 2400 hours or 72 months calendar time. I just had the calendar time discussion a couple of weeks ago. In short, maybe if you plane is kept outside in harsh conditions 72 months maybe valid. However, for most of us 2400 hours is the better guideline.
__________________
Rick Aronow,
A&P, iRMT
Flying 7A Slider;
RV-12 (ELSA, Dual G3X), SOLD
Highland Village,TX
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:28 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.