VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 01-21-2018, 04:28 PM
Vansconvert Vansconvert is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 115
Default Any improvements in the 8 over time?

Has the factory made any improvements or changes to the construction of the eight over time? I don't mean recommended service bulletins, I mean the way the plane is built?
__________________
RV-7A
IO-360 Hartzell CSP
Purchased
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-21-2018, 05:12 PM
RV6_flyer's Avatar
RV6_flyer RV6_flyer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC25
Posts: 2,895
Default

I am the 3rd owner of RV-8 kit 80012. Almost nothing was done on the tail when I purchased the kit. The tail is now complete.

The elevators have been updated. Early RV-8 used RV-6 elevators. Late RV-8s have RV-7 elevators. The difference is the counter weight. The RV-7 elevators use 1.25 pounds (IIRC) less lead but are balanced. Yes I purchased a few parts so that I could save the 2.5 pounds.

When you get to the wings, all late model have an included stall warning parts in the kit.
__________________
Gary A. Sobek
NC25 RV-6
Flying
3,300+ hours
Building RV-8 S/N: 80012

To most people, the sky is the limit.
To those who love aviation, the sky is home.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-21-2018, 06:10 PM
goatflieg's Avatar
goatflieg goatflieg is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 367
Default

The plane went through a redesign; not sure of the date. I bought my first pre-plans kit in 2003 and had to replace it with the newer one in 2013 because it was obsolete.
__________________
Martin J Filiatrault
Clarkston, MI
RV-8 #83507 - empennage complete (except fiberglass)
QB wings & fuselage work continues
N657AR reserved
Builder websites:
http://goatflieg.blogspot.com/
http://www.mykitlog.com/goatflieg/
YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/user/goatflieg
Dues paid for 2018... extra payment included for psychological therapeutic services rendered.

_______________________

Have you ever gotten the feeling you were smarter than you could ever prove?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-21-2018, 06:25 PM
Vansconvert Vansconvert is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 115
Default

What was redesigned?
__________________
RV-7A
IO-360 Hartzell CSP
Purchased
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-21-2018, 06:47 PM
jimgreen jimgreen is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Vancouver island, BC Canada
Posts: 376
Default

The RV8 was apparently not a prepunched kit initially, so some of the builder sites show the fuse on a jig. This likely would cause changes in a number of areas. At the moment I'm having trouble with the WD822 gear tower weldment and wishing that wasn't prepunched. Can't get the holes to line up with the skins and gear tower outer plate.
__________________
Jim Green
RV7 tip up
IO360 Whirlwind 200RV
Building RV8 with buddy
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-21-2018, 07:18 PM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 11,232
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimgreen View Post
The RV8 was apparently not a prepunched kit initially, so some of the builder sites show the fuse on a jig. This likely would cause changes in a number of areas. At the moment I'm having trouble with the WD822 gear tower weldment and wishing that wasn't prepunched. Can't get the holes to line up with the skins and gear tower outer plate.
I'm sure Scott will chime in.

There is a difference between "prepunched" and "match hole".

"Prepunched" required jigging and I think the only thing prepunched ware the skins, not the underlying structure.

With the "prepunched" kits, both the skins and underlying structures were punched so you just clecoed them together and drill the holes to final size. No jigging required.

There was also an increase in the Acrobatic Gross Weight. I think this was due to a change in the main spar stiffener.

You will have to check with Van's to find out at what serial number each of these changes were incorporated.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html

Last edited by N941WR : 01-22-2018 at 06:32 AM. Reason: Added "Acrobatic" in front of "Gross Weight"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-21-2018, 08:39 PM
RV8JD's Avatar
RV8JD RV8JD is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 742
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N941WR View Post

There was also an increase in Gross Weight.
Only in the Aerobatic Gross Weight. The so-called "Dash 1" wing came about later to make the RV-8 and RV-7 wings more common. This commonality results in a 50 pound increase in the Aerobatic Gross Weight (from 1550 to 1600 pounds), but offers no increase in the Max Gross Weight (1800 pounds).
__________________
Carl N.
Arlington, WA (KAWO)
RV-8, 300 Tach Hours
(Pic 1),(Pic 2)
- Out with the Old, In with the New
(Pic)
RV-8, 1938 Tach Hours (Pic 1),(Pic 2) - Sold

Glasflügel H-201B Standard Libelle, N564NS - Sold
Rolladen-Schneider LS1-f, N61MP - No longer owned
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-21-2018, 11:33 PM
skylor's Avatar
skylor skylor is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 606
Default -1 Fuselage

The fuselage kits after ~2007 or 2008 are designated as the “dash 1” fuselage. These later kits incorporated significant design changes of the internal structure to facilitate the matched hole pre punch features. These kits actually have many formed parts and reduced overall parts count over the older kits. I suspect that the primary reason Van’s invested in this upgrade was to help reduce the cost and improve quality of the quick-build kits. The benefit for slow builders is that the newer kits require much less hand fabrication of various piece parts from raw materials and provides for easier fit-up and alignment of the fuselage structures. The plans are also significantly improved. Many of the parts in the later fuselage also include lightening holes that were not present or called out in the earlier kits. I estimate that the -1 fuselage is around 5-10 lbs (maybe more) lighter than the original design. Externally, the -1 is virtually identical to the original kit.

Skylor
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-22-2018, 06:31 AM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 11,232
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RV8JD View Post
Only in the Aerobatic Gross Weight. The so-called "Dash 1" wing came about later to make the RV-8 and RV-7 wings more common. This commonality results in a 50 pound increase in the Aerobatic Gross Weight (from 1550 to 1600 pounds), but offers no increase in the Max Gross Weight (1800 pounds).
I stand corrected. This morning I was thinking about my reply above and came back to correct the GW comment. - Thanks Carl!
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html

Last edited by N941WR : 01-22-2018 at 06:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:35 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.