VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #11  
Old 01-18-2018, 10:21 AM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 11,149
Default

Scott,

I know you don't usually deal in "what-if's", but can you indulge me this one time?

How much longer would the engine mount for the -14 need to be to put the CG where it would work for the parallel valve (I)O-360 and what would you expect the performance hit to be?
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-18-2018, 11:29 AM
rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hubbard Oregon
Posts: 7,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N941WR View Post
Scott,

I know you don't usually deal in "what-if's", but can you indulge me this one time?

How much longer would the engine mount for the -14 need to be to put the CG where it would work for the parallel valve (I)O-360 and what would you expect the performance hit to be?
I think the weight delta is about 40 lbs.

Assuming that is correct, a quick W&B calc shows that for the lighter engine to have the same moment it would have to be 6" further fwd. This would not be accounting for the fact that the prop weight was pushed further fwd as well, so the actual required might end up being about 5".

If it was an unmodified 180 HP parallel valve engine, cruise speed diff. would probably be in the neighborhood of 10 kts slower compared to the 200 HP IO-360 and a little bit more, compared to the IO-390.

The difference that would be more directly noticeable would be take-off and climb performance.
__________________
Any opinions expressed in this message are my own and not necessarily those of my employer.

Scott McDaniels
Hubbard, Oregon
RV-6A (aka "Junkyard Special ")
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-18-2018, 11:55 AM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 11,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rvbuilder2002 View Post
...

The difference that would be more directly noticeable would be take-off and climb performance.
And the look. A long nosed RV-14 would look kind of funny.

I suspect most people are asking about sticking an IO-540 up front, not a smaller engine.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-18-2018, 12:18 PM
rv7charlie rv7charlie is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pocahontas MS
Posts: 2,548
Default alt engine heresy

It's a shame that RVers are so Continental-averse. A C--IO360 is 210 HP, no heavier (usually lighter) than an angle valve Lyc 360, and smoooooth.....

Yes, shorter TBO & more cylinders to purchase, but...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:12 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.