VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-10
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-10-2018, 12:23 AM
gmcjetpilot's Avatar
gmcjetpilot gmcjetpilot is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,725
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MConner View Post
And a a 50 year old airframe with retracts and an FAA strait jacket on changes to avionics and airframes? Not even apples and oranges.
Being the manufacturer and maintenance shop, able to do modifications and use your own fabricated parts or "experimental" parts (engine, prop, avionics, EFIS), with less FAA restrictions, is priceless (and less expensive to own because of that). Resale of RV's had proved to be excellent.

For 2 seats side-by -side or tandem there are not many GA aircraft to compare to the RV-7/14 or RV-4/8, so that helps decision to built. Most builders love working with their hands, process and learning.
__________________
George
Raleigh, NC Area
RV-4, RV-7, ATP, CFII, MEI, 737/757/767

Last edited by gmcjetpilot : 11-10-2018 at 12:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-10-2018, 12:51 PM
jliltd jliltd is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Rancho San Lorenzo
Posts: 402
Default

I own a 260B Comanche and it is fantastic, stable, speedy, safe and has a huge CG range. No cowl flaps or cooling problems. And maintenance isn't too bad if kept up with.

Jim
__________________
RV-8
RV-3B
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-10-2018, 01:14 PM
Ivan Kristensen's Avatar
Ivan Kristensen Ivan Kristensen is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Guelph Ontario
Posts: 224
Default Because we're passionate......

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle Boatright View Post
A lot of very rational people would choose the Comanche or an equivalent Bo over the RV-10, given the $100k cost difference. We buy/build RV's (and own Comanches) because we're passionate, not because any of it makes sense or can be reasonably justified.
Kyle,
You hit the nail right on the head with the above statement.

"We buy/build RV's (and own Comanches) because we're passionate, not because any of it makes sense or can be reasonably justified."
__________________
Ivan Kristensen
Guelph, ON. Canada
RV-10 (C-GMDV) 1150hrs.
Dual GRT 8.4" EFIS, TT A/P, Avidyne IFD440, Dual EI's


Link to my build site:
https://ivankristensen.smugmug.com/B...ENTAL-aircraft
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-30-2018, 05:29 PM
grubbat's Avatar
grubbat grubbat is offline
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ga
Posts: 599
Default Indicated vs True

Descending out of 17,000ft at VNE (not recommended), the RV-10 would need to keep indicated airspeed around 148kts or less due to the weaker structure. It is true air speed limited to 200kts.

On the other hand, the stronger yet older (50yr) Comanche could descend at 201kts INDICATED which trues out to around 270kts.

Once the -10 gets down to around 8500ft, it'll will be back in the hunt..... unless the Comanche has already landed, refueled, and robbed the courtesy car. (I hate it when that happens!)

Happy New Year!
__________________
Craig

RV-3 Sold
RV-4 Sold
RV-6a Sold
RV-9 IO-360 CS, Built and Flying
Comanche 260 - poor mans RV-10
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:11 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.