VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 09-26-2019, 08:11 PM
vlittle's Avatar
vlittle vlittle is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Victoria, Canada
Posts: 2,164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rv6ejguy View Post
The LOP button is designed to be used when you lean the engine to LOP. This advances the timing (usually 3-5 degrees) and picks up some of the power lost when running lean of peak due to the slower burn rate of the mixture.

Usually see 3-6 knots come back over fixed mag timing, depending on airframe and how far LOP you are.

The amount of advance for LOP is user programmable as are the basic RPM and MAP timing curves. In fact, almost every parameter right down to cranking retard and coil charge times can be changed.

This is the "Last Word" in aircraft EI systems where you want full control of your timing and not a canned curve like most other EIs offer.
I'm not from Missouri (actually from Victoria), but all of these claims about ignition timing made me skeptical. I have an IO540 9.2:1 running one magneto and an Electroair electronic ignition.

I have a switch that cuts off the MAP sensor so I can have baseline timing or advanced timing. That also provided me a convenient spot to intercept the advance signal and massage it with an arduino controller.

So I wrote a sketch that allowed me to add or subtract ignition timing in flight and test some of the claims.

The first test was to try changing the timing with a rich 'best power' mixture at 8500 PA. Stock timing from the Electroair was 33 degrees. I tried between 27 and 38 degrees with no measureable change in airspeed of 201 knots.

The second test was to go LOP around 180 knots and find the best timing. Baseline was 177 knots at 33 degrees and 180 knots at 38 degrees. Yeah!

So, based on this rather elementary test, it looks like the 'canned' curve is a bit too conservative LOP, thus proving Ross's assertion. But I also had to watch CHTs in the climb, so maybe it was too agressive ROP. I can always turn off the advance with the switch, though.

So maybe I can change the shape of my advance curve with some simple programming... less advance when ROP and more advance when LOP. I can figure this out from the Dynon serial data stream.

Vern
__________________
===========
V e r n. ====
=======
RV-9A complete
Harmon Rocket complete
S-21 wings complete
Victoria, BC (Summer)
Chandler, Az (Winter)
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.