What's new
Van's Air Force

Don't miss anything! Register now for full access to the definitive RV support community.

RV-3: Phase 1 Tweaks

Ironflight

VAF Moderator / Line Boy
Mentor
Well here we sit with 39.0 hours on the RV-3?s clock and the rain coming down in a constant drizzle?.and it?s been low, or foggy, or rainy (or all three as a bonus!) since last Tuesday! Fortunately, we have essentially completed what I consider the legally ?essential? parts of Phase 1 (envelope definition and expansion, climb/glide/cruise performance, aerobatic maneuvers, and normal flight parameter definitions), so when we can get another hour in, we?ll be able to sign it off and start some cross-country work. Then of course, we?ll continue refining our performance tables and doing extensive avionics testing and practice before committing to things like IFR flight.


However, a few notes on things we?ve had to tweak during Phase 1 might interest those who have followed the RV-3 build?.


1) We had a heck of a time keeping the beautiful Aero LED Pulsars (Nav and Strobe) going. This was quite a mystery ? they could be dismounted from the bayonets quickly, and with a little wire wiggling, they?d work again. Then a flight or two later, they?d be dead. More wire wiggly and connector examination. They were installed with the supplied Molex block connectors. When I got serious about troubleshooting them that turned out to be the problem ? Dean was very helpful, and admitted that they really weren?t very high quality connectors ? they are working on something better. In the meantime, I replaced them with D-Sub pins and sockets (we?re talking real low current), and they?ve been rock solid ever since.

2) The right brake went mushy a few times. Back during the inspection, our DAR?s boss (Ann Asberry) noted a drip of red fluid on the tip of the bleeder, so I had tightened it up. I bled them a couple of additional times, and always made sure the bleeder was tight ? but it kept leaking. I finally took the broader view, and realized that the fitting that the bleeder valve screws in to was a bit loose ? it is an NPT fitting, and needed a little additional encouragement to stop seeping.

3) A little wheel pant damage ? we must have had a rock kick up between the left tire and pant, and it took a little chunk out of the rear corner of the tire opening, and cracked the pant about an inch from the opening for several inches. No problem ? this took about ten minutes of work, and a couple of hours of cure time ? then it was back to flying. Just glad it isn?t painted yet! We might open up the clearances another quarter inch.

4) Comm 1 seemed to have a limited transmit range, and it wasn?t receiving AWOS?s very well either. Gee?.you should be able to talk to the moon with a GNS 430W. Of course, it works a lot better if the BNC connector is properly seated on the antenna?..that just took a floor panel pull to chase down.

5) We have had a little cracking of the inboard lower skin of the left flap ? the little piece that sticks out to fair into the fuselage. This is very thin skin on the RV-3, and is essentially unsupported. It started cracking at a rivet in the front, and right at the bend (of course!) at the trailing edge. We stopped drilled both, and had no further propagation ? but we?ll do a doubler or a different configuration before paint.

6) We had to replace the G3X ADAHRS right after first flight ? Garmin was VERY fast in getting this out to us. We had a pretty early serial number, and the problem was just with the Air Data board ? they suspected a connector inside the box, and we haven?t had a single bad hit of data with the new box.

7) The rear-most rivet that holds the canopy hinge to the fuselage popped - the head came right off. I attributed this to having the safety cable a little long, and as the canopy opened past vertical, it induced a ?camming? force that pulled up on the hinge. Shortening the cable help a lot. At some point, we?re going to figure out the geometry for a strut.

8) The canopy latch was getting stiff, and I realized that the shaft was sliding ?inboard? through the skirt hole, binding the pushrods. I added a nylon spacer on the shaft between the skirt and the outside handle, holding the handle in position ? it?s much better now (but still stiff!)

9) Left fuel gauge went ?inop? after a few hours. Seems to be an intermittent connection inside the tank ? Dang! Fortunately, we aren?t painted yet, so when we get some downtime after Phase 1, we?ll pull the tank and replace the sender ? new one is on hand already.

10) I am a bit worried about the ventilation ? the round skirt vents we installed are gorgeous, but seem to be embedded in a bad flow area ? they produce mostly noise, and little airflow. We have a set of RV-10 back-seat vents on order that we might install in the fuselage below the longeron ? one or both of these should do the trick.​

Overall, the test program has been outstanding! I have done most of the envelope work, and Louise has been working through performance data collection ? which will continue into Phase 2. I have been amazed at how well thigns like gear alignment and trim have worked out - even with a kit this basic, it is hard to screw it up enough to matter. Random errors do seem to cancel out....

The little tweaks we?ve mentioned above have not diminished our enjoyment and satisfaction one bit ? this is without a doubt, a pilot?s airplane!


Paul
 
Thanks for adding even further to all the great RV-3B documentation you've already created, Paul. Based on your writeups as well as Randy's and Rob's, I was just about certain I was going to move forward with starting my own -3B project before the price increase last Weds.

However, I sat in the company -8A in Aurora on Monday and now I have second thoughts. I'm not huge but not particularly small either. I liked the fit of the -8's front seat. I've never sat in a -3, but I've compared the dimensions in the two plane's plans. I'm just anxious about whether the -3 will feel too small for me.

Since you have both, any thoughts?

--
Stephen
 
However, I sat in the company -8A in Aurora on Monday and now I have second thoughts. I'm not huge but not particularly small either. I liked the fit of the -8's front seat. I've never sat in a -3, but I've compared the dimensions in the two plane's plans. I'm just anxious about whether the -3 will feel too small for me.

Since you have both, any thoughts?

--
Stephen

You have to build the airplane that fits your mission, and the -3 and -8 fill different missions, depending on if you fly solo or with a passenger!

As for fit - the -3 fits like a glove - we built it that way. We could have made more room if we went with "stock" interior stuff, but we built a little fighter cockpit. the -8 is definitely roomy. I'm 5'9" and 165.....I saw a picture recently of what appeared to be a much larger fellow with his new (to him) RV-3. you need to sit in one to see how it would feel.

Paul
 
On ventilation - would it make sense to install a vent on the fiberglass canopy fairing right behind the forward frame bow? In some photos, it looks like one of Van's NACA scoops would fit right there, especially on the starboard side. The fiberglass to fiberglass bond would be easy and secure.

Perhaps an eyeball outlet could be fitted directly to the inlet. It might be high enough to get out of any disturbed air flow from the cheeks, and would certainly be direct.

It might also be instructive to tuft the area. I'd be very interested in that.

Wheel pants - what sort of clearances are you running at the moment?

Your reports are very encouraging, keep 'em up!

Dave
-3B empennage, wing and fuselage kits on order, expected in April.
 
Paul,

Data point: The forward fuselage aft of the firewall and below the cheeks is a great high pressure area on the -4 (just outboard of the footwells). We have silver dollar panels (Van's p/n CA LV-3) installed on each side and they work very well. We used a simple push/pull cable acutuator to open and close them. Ventilates the cockpit from the bottom up and works really well in the summer and in the winter as well when you want to mix some fresh air with heated air. These panels can partially open or open backwards to pull air from the cockpit.

Cheers,

Vac
 
On ventilation - would it make sense to install a vent on the fiberglass canopy fairing right behind the forward frame bow? In some photos, it looks like one of Van's NACA scoops would fit right there, especially on the starboard side. The fiberglass to fiberglass bond would be easy and secure.

Perhaps an eyeball outlet could be fitted directly to the inlet. It might be high enough to get out of any disturbed air flow from the cheeks, and would certainly be direct.

It might also be instructive to tuft the area. I'd be very interested in that.

Wheel pants - what sort of clearances are you running at the moment?

On the ventilation, the canopy skirt behind the forward bow (aft of the instrument panel is basically where we have the LV-3 vents. Consultation with my favorite aerodynamacist (not me) confirms that is a pretty bad area to try and get inlet flow, unfortunately.

Wheel pant clearance right now is the width of Louise's thumb joint. We will probably open it up to the width of MY thumb joint - which has worked well on the -8 and the -6. Like just about everyone, we are always trying for as little a gap as necessary, and you always guess too small for clearances....

Paul,

Data point: The forward fuselage aft of the firewall and below the cheeks is a great high pressure area on the -4 (just outboard of the footwells). We have silver dollar panels (Van's p/n CA LV-3) installed on each side and they work very well. We used a simple push/pull cable acutuator to open and close them. Ventilates the cockpit from the bottom up and works really well in the summer and in the winter as well when you want to mix some fresh air with heated air. These panels can partially open or open backwards to pull air from the cockpit.

Cheers,

Vac

Thanks Vac - unfortunately, the -3 doesn't have quite as much space down in the leg wells (by the rudder pedals) as the -4. We were first going to copy some great -4 ideas we had, and were disappointed when they didn't fit. I'm thinking of putting vents down in that same area that you mention (under the cheek cowls) but a little further aft. I haven't cut any holes yet though - so we'll see....

Paul
 
So?

How would you rate it as an aerobatic mount? Can you do crisp 4 point rolls in her? 8 points maybe?

If you've flown a Pitts, how does Jr. compare in control response and roll rate?

Thanks,
 
How would you rate it as an aerobatic mount? Can you do crisp 4 point rolls in her? 8 points maybe?

If you've flown a Pitts, how does Jr. compare in control response and roll rate?

Thanks,

Well Pierre, the Pitts is one lien of aircraft in which I have never had any flight time, so I can't give you a comparison. I doubt that anyone will be using an RV-3 to compete in world-class unlimited aerobatic competition, since it is still a "Total Performance" airplane, and doesn't live in a specialized niche.

Hesitation rolls are nice BTW - I won't say that mine are particularly crisp, but that's not the fault of the airplane....

Paul
 
A different opinion

10) I am a bit worried about the ventilation ? the round skirt vents we installed are gorgeous, but seem to be embedded in a bad flow area ? they produce mostly noise, and little airflow. We have a set of RV-10 back-seat vents on order that we might install in the fuselage below the longeron ? one or both of these should do the trick.[/INDENT]

Paul

While acknowledging that Paul has a lot more hours in the -3, I haven't noticed any problem with ventilation. I have a strong breeze on my face when the vents are open and more ventilation than I really like when the vents are closed. Of course, it also has been pretty cool on all flights, so far.

Remember that Paul is a product of Minnesota and has the air conditiioner on in the house and car all months of the year in Texas. I'm not convinced that this issue is "real" for me or warm-weather lovers.
 
Plea For Yarn Tufts

I'd sure like to see some photos from another airplane of the cockpit and cowling and wing and landing gear attachment areas with yarn tufts taped on.

It would be very interesting and show us what effects the cheeks have.

Ideally it would be at cruise and again at climb angle of attack and power.

I've noticed that it's useful to take at least a couple photos of the same spot because there's a chance you'll get a prop blade passage and its wash, which is quite localized, will stir things up. In between blade passages the free-stream flow can be seen.

People tend to think of prop wash as a steady but turbulent flow although it's actually quite limited in area. Of course you get three passages each revolution with a three-bladed prop, so they come pretty often. You'll see.

Thanks!
Dave
 
How would you rate it as an aerobatic mount? Can you do crisp 4 point rolls in her? 8 points maybe?

If you've flown a Pitts, how does Jr. compare in control response and roll rate?

Crisp point rolls? Oh yeah...but that's a pilot factor. Can do as many points as you like. Bob Hoover did nice crisp 16-pt rolls in the Shrike. :)

With inverted systems, I think an RV is more capable than a Super Decathlon, and handles much nicer. An RV will do almost everything a Pitts will do, but it just doesn't have the roll rate or quite the power-to-weight ratio. Depending on the model, Pitts' roll between about 180-240 deg/sec. I'd guess the RV-3 is in the 130 deg/sec. range. Probably the only non-gyroscopic maneuver I wouldn't do in an RV that I would in the Pitts are outside and vertical up snaps. Except for gyroscopics (which I wouldn't do in an RV either), all other aerobatics is just a combination of loop, roll, spin, and snap maneuvers. An RV will do many combinations of these figures to perfection in skilled hands.

Most aerobatic airplanes are a lot more capable than 99% of the pilots who fly them. A pilot might quickly learn to push the limits of an airplane's performance capabilities, but he/she will not so quickly push the limits of peformance PLUS precision. A pilot only truly needs to move to a higher-performing mount when they can extract total performance and do it with a high-degree of precision. Most don't work hard enough to ever get to this level, regardless of aircraft type. There are very few pilots in the world (I'm not one of them) who can do that even in a Pitts, even though the modern carbon monoplanes far exceed the performance of the Pitts.
 
Last edited:
RV3 flap reinforcement and fresh-air scoop

flaps reinforcement: There was nothing in the plans for how to reinforce or fair the .020 lower inboard flap skin with the fuselage, so I took a piece of .040 2024-T3, riveted to the fwd flap spar as shown, and overlapped the last few fasteners on the aft end of the flap rib for stiffness. The trick is to make the riveting flush on the inside where the reinforced flap skin contacts the fuselage when flaps are up, but 040 is not thick enough to allow flush rivet on the outside as well, which I left round-head.

2wg4oc9.jpg


air-scoop: note the eyeball blower vent on left side of panel. The air scoop is just fwd of that. Plenty of air blast through - I'm sure someone could do a much better job with a less obtrusive scoop in that position.

1znn2w9.jpg


- Steven
700 RV3 hours
(plus 2.5 more yesterday!)
 
Engine upgrade

Paul,

This may seem like a silly question but would the IO-375 or IO-360 go on the -3B?

Would that be just too much get up and go?

It would be kind of a Rocket -3 but if your looking for an aircraft with amazing performance and isn't $180k with a brand new engine then the -3B with the IO-360 would be kind of cool.

Is thqat an option?
 
Gus, I think the big problem with going with a larger engine is you would most definatly go beyond VNE of the Airframe. Paul had stated earlier that even with the 0320 he has to throttle back to not exceed VNE, and as we all know once you go beyond VNE your kinda on your own. Now I have never looked very detailed into the 3 but is there anyway you could beef up the airframe to potentially increase VNE?

-david
 
Great pictures Steven - I had decided we'd do some reinforcement on the flap, and now I know how I want to do it!

On the bigger engine....I personally don't think I'd go any bigger without a balanced tail (like has been done on a beautiful RV-3 called "Hack Job" out in New Mexico. I can't remember what he has for an engine, but he did a beautiful job on a custom tail.

Yes, we can go over red line right now with the -320. No need for more for our purposes....

Paul
 
What is that?

Um, this may be off of the subject a little but is that underwear in the "Power, Mixture" levers? It looks like it and if so what the heck are you doing in your 3? Secondly, how much room is really in there?

All valid questions....

1znn2w9.jpg


- Steven
700 RV3 hours
(plus 2.5 more yesterday!)
 
under...WHAT???

Nope, not under-dundies, but a Rambo headband ... you know, Top Gun, Sierra Hotel and all that. Essential for dogfights - and oh, that's the radar-tracking gunsight on the canopy bow. When you get your -7 built, check 6 often Bob, I'll be a-lookin' to put the pipper on ye (aye laddie, you've awakened the Merciless Celt in me ...)

- Steven
700 RV3 hours
 
RV3 cockpit size

Now, to the worthwhile question - yep, the -3 cockpit is snug. I am 175lbs, 6', and it's just right for me. No room to move around, though. Three hours airborne in there, and I'm ready to take it off (yes, you don't "climb into" an RV3, you "put it on and wear it". No joke.)

- Steven
700 RV3 hours

(P.S. That's not REALLY a gunsight on the canopy bow, it's my micro-GPS. Had you worried there, didn't I, eh??) ("Safety-brief all dogfights, discuss all offensive and defensive maneuvers, and never take on an ex-Air Force or Navy guy, or he'll eat your lunch for you. (And don't even THINK about doing it with an ex-MARINE - he'll take you out, your extended family, your neighborhood, your hometown ... ").

Peace.
 
Steven,

Hope you don't mind another Bob rolling in to offer mutual support to a fellow Bob, but...

This is too good to pass up! ;)

Totally looks like underdundies...it coulda been a great story! :p

A Rambo headband? C'mon, Rambo's headband had blood on it, and it was torn from an OD green t-shirt! That thing's paisley! :rolleyes:

Truth be known, I might turn tail and bug out from a guy that's wearing that...gotta be pretty dern tough to wear that in a fight! :eek:

"Snap guns", now "chaff, flares, out of burner, ready to pitch back in if the threat turns hard". Thanks for letting an intruder into the fight...all in fun brudda! (Oh, and I like the looks of your 3!!) :D

Paul, thanks for allowing a little furball into your thread...the content of that is great to learn from!

Cheers,
Bob
 
Last edited:
On ventilation - would it make sense to install a vent on the fiberglass canopy fairing right behind the forward frame bow? In some photos, it looks like one of Van's NACA scoops would fit right there, especially on the starboard side. The fiberglass to fiberglass bond would be easy and secure.

Perhaps an eyeball outlet could be fitted directly to the inlet. It might be high enough to get out of any disturbed air flow from the cheeks, and would certainly be direct.

Hah! I just noticed SK-59, which describes the same inlet in that same position but with a different outlet.

I haven't even gotten my kits yet and I'm learning that you've got to read EVERYTHING!

Anyway, there it is....

Dave

Update --
I was reading "27 Years of the RVator," and it has a bit on this that's worth mentioning. It says that this position doesn't work very well. But adding a couple vortex generators ahead of the inlet works. Then on an RV-4, a better position is on the lower fuselage below the cheeks, but didn't define the exact location. This was on page 176, if you have the book.
Dave
 
Last edited:
What Did You Decide? And How Did It Work Out?

After seeing that great paint job I figured that you resolved this issue to your satisfaction.

And?

Thanks!

Dave
 
Back
Top