What's the thinking behind taxiing with them down?
In the RAF taxiing a spit with flaps down resulted in a fine paid to the mess fund.
What's the thinking behind taxiing with them down?
The only time I come in with no flaps is in really gusty conditions as mentioned.
.
....I was originally taught the "always raise your flaps for taxi" when learning to fly a Cessna, but then I once had a really experienced instructor ask me, rhetorically, "why?" Neither of us could find a good answer to that. ....
Sure. If the winds are 35-40 knots, or whatever it takes a 150 to get off the ground, some common sense would be in order. I could see that.When I was learning to fly, I had an instructor who answered that question on a windy day. We were taxiing along in the Cessna 150 into the wind, not all that fast, and he abruptly dropped the flaps and hauled back on the wheel. We were at or just above idle power - and it was windy, remember. The airplane popped off the ground, stalled, and dropped back down.
Got my attention.
Dave
Why? Still don't see the purpose of doing that.
During calm conditions, I can't see a reason not to use full flaps (short of no-flap landing practice). Less kinetic energy on touchdown, less chance of nose wheel shimmy (for us -A guys), easier on brakes, tires, etc.
Why? Still don't see the purpose of doing that.
I thought of one case where adding flaps can be a problem. When practicing coupled approaches my autopilot pitch servo gets overloaded due to out of trim condition when I add flaps. For that reason I may land without flaps after flying a coupled approach. John
Interesting discussion. I've had my (bought) -7A less than a year, but my experience is that flaps on my plane add very little lift, mainly just drag. When going from no flaps to full flaps, the plane does not required any trimming, which tells me there's little additional lift. I always use full flaps landing except in strong, gusty crosswinds, because the drag from the flaps combined with the flat CS prop are like putting on speed brakes during the flare and floating is negligible, even at the fairly high approach speeds I use.
Very interesting points, Jimmy. I've always read "climb into, dive away from" when it comes to how to hold the controls when on the ground. That matches your suggestion.Using extremes makes it easier to see sometimes.
Imagine an airplane that lands at two hundred, versus one that lands at twenty. We have a twenty mile per hour crosswind. The two hundred m.p.h. plane goes forward 200 units for every 20 sideways, while the twenty m.p.h. plane goes 20 forward and twenty sideways.
So, the angle the plane crabs while flying to maintain a track over the runway is different. The twenty m.p.h. plane is in a 45 degree crab. The 200 m.p.h. plane less than ten degree crab. To land, we transition from a crab to a slip by using rudder to push the nose to align with the direction of runway, so the tires are parallel with the direction we need to be going to land.
The 200 airplane needs very little rudder imput to accomplish this. It is almost like the crosswind is non existent. The twenty m.p.h. plane takes a huge amount of rudder, and may not even have enough rudder imput to swing the nose that far!
If we could have a way to just change the 20 m.p.h. airplane into a 200 m.p.h. airplane when we need that for landings.
So, the point of this is two fold. One, the faster we can land, the less crab angle we have to overcome. If we are close to a speed where we are using full rudder and we get gusts on top of it, we might not have enough control to land. So, a no flap landing raises the stall speed slightly to allow us to touch down faster with less crab angle to remove with rudder!
This is the control our airplane has to make it closer to the 200 m.p.h. plane. Secondly, the faster we go, the more force a deflected control has for a given imput. If we can land faster (stall at higher speed), the rudder won't need as much deflection to align the nose to the direction of travel necessary to land as it would at a slower speed. We have more control reserve, so to speak, at higher landing speeds!
The rudder works on a lever arm back from the center of gravity of the plane. If you can make the plane land faster, less rudder imput is necessary for the force required to align the airplanes with the runway, and less change of angle is required too.
If you move the center of gravity forward, your rudder has more authority too, because you lengthen the lever arm (another discussion)!
Now, one last thing: remember, lift causes drag. After touchdown, the airplane still wants to weathervane towards the wind. Let's say we have a right crosswind. The plane wants to turn right. As we slow, the rudder runs out of enough force to keep the plane aligned with the runway. The plane is still light on the tires, so brakes don't work well either.
If only we could have some way to pull backwards on the left wing till we get a little slower and the tires have enough friction to grip! We do, but most pilots quit flying after touchdown. Roll the ailerons full stop towards the wind after touching down.
In this situation, the left aileron is down, causing lift and also drag. More drag on the left wing is free help to keep us aligned with the direction we want to go and not the way the cross wind wants us to weathervane and go! It is like giving the full left rudder we are holding just a little boost!
Just some thoughts I hadn't seen up to this point..
jimmyB
RV-6
A question for the experts. I fly my 6A from a field where most strong winds are 80-90* crosswinds from the South. There are a bunch of buildings and trees on the south side of the field that are about 100 yards away and for the whole length of the runway. I get a lot of unpleasant gusting, rotors, etc. When the winds are gusting >20-25, I get violent sinks of 5' or so while flaring. Due to this, I have dropped my SOP from 40 -> 30* of flaps.
I am wondering, will reducing flaps further help me to better manage these situations? It is a 4000' runway, so I have plenty of room to work with.
Thanks,
Larry
Interesting discussion. I've had my (bought) -7A less than a year, but my experience is that flaps on my plane add very little lift, mainly just drag. When going from no flaps to full flaps, the plane does not required any trimming, which tells me there's little additional lift. I always use full flaps landing except in strong, gusty crosswinds, because the drag from the flaps combined with the flat CS prop are like putting on speed brakes during the flare and floating is negligible, even at the fairly high approach speeds I use.
The OP was asking about landing his RV-9, which is significantly different than your RV-7A. The -9 with its high lift / aspect ratio wing and follower flaps is significantly different than a -7(A).
As you read these replies, pay attention to the airplane listed in the signature sector the commentators.
With the -9, you want drag and must nail the approach speed (especially with a FP prop).
In the interest of clarity regarding details of the RV-9, it doesn't have follower (or fowler) flaps. It has slotted flaps.
Fowler flaps deploy on a track system (think Cessna) that moves the flaps aft for an increase in wing area before they actually start to deflect much.
I do agree with the rest though......
thanks for the suggestion. I have made the change to my signature.A).
As you read these replies, pay attention to the airplane listed in the signature sector the commentators
Not sure how to highlight the quote from a previous post but the above was said. I think it is nice when people put their aircraft type in their actual post. I have had times when I read a question, saw no aircraft type, looked at the signature and still did not know the aircraft type. I think it is a good habit to mention the aircraft type in the post so everybody knows what the real question is.
Also, as an FYI, there are a few ways to quote something. If you wish to quote the entire post just click on the word QUOTE at the bottom of that person's post. If you want to quote more than one post click on the quotation marks at the bottom of their post until the last person you wish to quote. Then on that last one click on the word QUOTE. IF you only want to quote part of what they said just delete the words out from between the QUOTE tags. Or, you can cut and paste words in a quote by copying them then clicking on the 'quote' button above your post in the toolbars. It is the button that looks like a little cartoon QUOTE bubble with words in it.
Thank you, good to learn something new even if it not airplane related.
Several posts here talk about coming over the fence below ## kts and anything below that it "Sinks like a rock (SLAR)".
...
It would interesting to note the what SLAR speeds at idle the previous posters are experiencing.